Simulation of Radiation Field in Multilamp Photoreactor Using the LSDE Model
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Determination of a radiation field in a multilamp photoreactor is rather difficult due to the blockage of light by the neighbouring lamps in the reactor. Shadow zones in the photoreactor caused by the lamp blockage vary according to the different lamp arrangements. In addition, the reactor shape also has an effect on the average light intensity, since light is absorbed by the reactor wall if it reaches the wall. In this study, selected aspects of reactor configuration and lamp arrangement were investigated in order to achieve the maximum average light intensity. A line source with a diffused emission (LSDE) model, which shows sufficient accuracy and simplicity, was selected to simulate the light field in the test reactor. Simulation indicates that the square and cylindrical reactors with two and four lamps installed symmetrically exhibited superior performance to elliptical and rectangular reactors. For a multilamp reactor, a triangular pitch of lamp arrangement with 33° is recommended for maximum average light intensity.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it