Environmental monitoring of fish plant effluent in coastal Newfoundland
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Offal from fish processing plants represents the largest organic waste stream in Newfoundland. It is important to understand the spatial dispersion properties of the waste to assess if there are possible options for waste management that may be advantageous to implement. Preliminary studies of a crab-processing plant's effluent were conducted in October 2004 whereby rhodamine WT, a common dye tracer was added to the effluent of a plant in Aquaforte, Newfoundland. Measurements were taken with a fluorometer, CTD (conductivity, temperature and depth) and dissolved oxygen sensor mounted on the back of an 18 ft inflatable boat equipped with an electric trolling motor to limit plume disturbance. Continuous spatial data corresponding to the sensor information was obtained using a GPS unit in the boat. Spatial and oceanographic data were integrated to obtain a visual and quantitative representation of the plume. A comparison of the actual plume was conducted with a plume dispersion model developed through the use of the plume modeling software, CORMIX and a geographic information system (GIS) to determine if there are any similarities.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".