MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2120064332 · doi:10.1109/icip.2005.1530619

Graceful image retrieval performance degradation using small world distributed indexing

2005· article· en· W2120064332 on OpenAlexaff
P. Androutsos, A.N. Venetsanopoulos, D. Androutsos

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicPeer-to-Peer Network Technologies
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan UniversityUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSearch engine indexingComputer scienceIndex (typography)Degradation (telecommunications)Image retrievalSmall-world networkInformation retrievalImage (mathematics)Object (grammar)ArchitectureSet (abstract data type)Small dataDistributed computingData miningArtificial intelligenceWorld Wide WebTelecommunicationsGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A small world search agent employing peer-to-peer concepts borrowed from sociology is employed for performing image retrievals in a small world distributed media index. The small world indexing method (SWIM) allows for a highly networked architecture where index information does not exist as a separate entity on a specific server, but rather is stored within the actual media objects themselves. Since each media object is only responsible for a small portion of the overall index, the loss of portions of the overall network (data objects) accounts for only a small degradation in the overall retrieval performance. Building upon previous work, the graceful degradation which is provided by the SWIM system is addressed here for retrievals which are performed using small world user agents on a large set of MPEG-7 described images.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.826
Threshold uncertainty score0.728

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.254
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicPeer-to-Peer Network TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207