Long-term consequences of spinal cord injury on social participation: the occurrence of handicap situations
Bibliographic record
Abstract
PURPOSE: Handicap situations in daily life of persons with Spinal Cord Injury (SCI) is rarely evaluated in spite of their impact on long-term health. The purpose of the present study was to identify the occurrence of potential handicap situations in individuals with SCI and to determine the potential associations between the level of social participation and some characteristics of the person. METHODS: Four hundred and eighty-two individuals completed a mailed questionnaire that comprised the 'assessment of life habits', a tool developed to assess social participation in persons with disabilities. RESULTS: Significant disruptions were particularly observed in home maintenance, participation in recreational and physical activities as well as in productive activities and the achievement of sexual relations. However, many individuals successfully achieved various social roles despite the presence of disabilities. No indications of a potential impact of premature ageing on the accomplishment of life habits were observed. CONCLUSIONS: The severity of injury seems to significantly increase the occurrence of handicap situations as the individuals with tetraplegia reported carrying out their life habits with much more difficulty or requiring more assistance than those with a less severe impairment.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".