HAP1 facilitates effects of mutant huntingtin on inositol 1,4,5‐trisphosphate‐induced Ca<sup>2+</sup> release in primary culture of striatal medium spiny neurons
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Huntington's disease is caused by polyglutamine expansion (exp) in huntingtin (Htt). Htt-associated protein-1 (HAP1) was the first identified Htt-binding partner. The type 1 inositol (1,4,5)-trisphosphate receptor (InsP3R1) is an intracellular Ca2+ release channel that plays an important role in neuronal function. Recently, we identified a InsP3R1-HAP1A-Htt ternary complex in the brain and demonstrated that Httexp, but not normal Htt, activates InsP3R1 in bilayers and facilitates InsP3R1-mediated intracellular Ca2+ release in medium spiny striatal neurons [MSN; T.-S. Tang et al. (2003) Neuron, 39, 227-239]. Here we took advantage of mice with targeted disruption of both HAP1 alleles (HAP1 -/-) to investigate the role of HAP1 in functional interactions between Htt and InsP3R1. We determined that: (i) HAP1 is expressed in the MSN; (ii) HAP1A facilitates functional effects of Htt and Htt(exp) on InsP3R1 in planar lipid bilayers; (iii) HAP1 is required for changes in MSN basal Ca2+ levels resulting from Htt or Htt(exp) overexpression; (iv) HAP1 facilitates potentiation of InsP3R1-mediated Ca2+ release by Htt(exp) in mouse MSN. Our present results indicate that HAP1 plays an important role in functional interactions between Htt and InsP3R1.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.007 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".