A TRADUÇÃO FEMINISTA: TEORIAS E PRÁTICAS SUBVERSIVAS: NÍSIA FLORESTA E A ESCOLA DE TRADUÇÃO CANADENSE
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Uma tradicao secular da traducao, desde a Hermeneutica ate as concepcoes linguisticas da metade do seculo passado, concebe a tarefa do/a tradutor/a como secundaria, transparente a ponto de ser invisivel. Assimila, entao, esse segundo texto ao segundo dele exigindo fidelidade ao primeiro texto dito original do autor omnipotente, damesma maneira que a mulher deve obediencia e fidelidade ao primeiro sexo, que se erige em paradigmo. A violencia social do androcentrismo, corresponde a da lingua falogocentrica. E isso que as subversoes teorico-praticas das tradutoras feministas tem tentado solapar, tornando visivel o feminino na lingua e portanto no mundo. Para Nisia Floresta, no seculo XIX, trata-se de manipular textos panfletarios feministas, assim realizando uma traducao heretica, mas de uma infidelidade criativa, na melhor tradicao classica francesa das Belles infideles. No palco dos anos 1970-90 no Quebec, as tradutoras canadenses, por sua vez, criaram estrategias radicais afim que a escrita feminina possa passar por um interpretacao ginocentrica.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.018 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.011 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".