Think deeply in energy questions of our country during the“Eleventh Five-Year Plan”
Bibliographic record
Abstract
At industrialized previous stage that our country finished walking at last during the State's Five-Year Plan period, per capita GDP topped 1000 dollars in 2003, indicate our country has already stepped foot on the heavy industrial stage of chemical industry, has begun economic transition. But meanwhile, the foundation stone of economic development –Energy， which has presented a series of questions. crisis Energy shortage ,etc. wording all let people have a lingering fear so far. In the paper, the author retrospect the energy state of Tenth Five-Year Plan period” combine the quantitative analysis method qualitative analysis method together, draws the problem that the energy of our country may face of in Eleventh Five-Year Plan period and put forward the corresponding settlement measure. Key words: the “Eleventh Five-Year Plan”, energy question, solution measure Resume: Dans la periode industrialisee anterieure, le constat que notre pays a fini de marcher le dernier pendant le 10e quinquennat et le PIB par personne a depasse 1000 dollars en 2003 indique que notre pays a deja accelere le pas sur la scene d’industrie lourde et a commence la transition economique. Mais en meme temps, la pierre angulaire du developpement economique –energie – a presente une serie de problemes. Des termes sigificatifs, comme « crise d’energie », « insuffisance d’energie », provoquent chez nons une peur constante. Dans l’article present, l’auteur, en passant en revue la situation energetique pendant le 10e quinquennat et en combinant les methodes d’analyse quantitative et qualitative, degage les problemes que notre energie pourrait affronter durant le 11e quinquennat, et propose des solutions correspondantes. Mots-Cles: 11e quinquennat, problemes d’energie, solutions, mesures
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.008 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.010 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.008 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".