Conducted EMI noise mitigation in DC-DC converters using active filtering method
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Electromagnetic interference (EMI) noise mitigation is an important issue that should be addressed and emphasized when designing DC/DC converters. These later, are known to be the primary culprit of the EMI noise generation in most of the electronic systems, mainly due to the switching action of the MOSFET circuitries. Passive input EMI LC filters have been the intuitive solution for EMI noise mitigation; hence they have been integrated in almost every DC/DC converters. However, their size, weight and cost can cause a significant constraint in some applications. To overcome these constraints, an input active EMI filter is proposed. The active filter is based on the noise current phase shift and the injection of this noise current back to the DC input bus. However, the combination of the input active and the passive filters shows a substantial attenuation of the conducted emissions as compared to the passive filter only, which in turn contributes to the reduction of the size and weight of the input passive EMI filter. The proposed combination provides a design solution for compliance engineers where the PCB real-estate is an issue. Experimental results to demonstrate the performance and the effectiveness of the input active EMI filter in DC/DC converters are presented.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".