MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2120198850 · doi:10.1109/icassp.2007.366756

On Optimality of Monotone Channel-Aware Transmission Policies: A Constrained Markov Decision Process Approach

2007· article· en· W2120198850 on OpenAlexaff
Minh Hanh Ngo, Vikram Krishnamurthy

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Wireless Network Optimization
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMarkov decision processComputer scienceLagrange multiplierMarkov processFadingMathematical optimizationNetwork packetTransmission (telecommunications)Channel (broadcasting)Channel state informationConstraint (computer-aided design)Buffer overflowTransmission delayWirelessComputer networkMathematicsTelecommunicationsStatistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A constrained Markov decision process (MDP) approach is deployed to prove the monotone structure of optimal channel-aware transmission policies for packet transmission over a correlated fading wireless channel subject to an average delay constraint. A transmission policy is a function mapping channel state information (CSI), buffer states and numbers of arriving packets to transmit probabilities. The objective is to minimize the average transmission energy cost subject to an average delay constraint. We use the Lagrange multiplier method to convert the constrained MDP to an unconstrained MDP and prove that the unconstrained optimal policy is threshold in the buffer state. It then follows that the constrained optimal transmission policy is a randomized mixture of two pure transmission policies that are threshold in the buffer occupancy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.019
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.031

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.019
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.002
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.003
Scholarly communication0.0020.003
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.254
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced Wireless Network OptimizationFrench-language works237,207