MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2120216636 · doi:10.5555/2675983.2676328

A discrete event simulation environment tailored to the needs of military human resources management

2013· article· en· W2120216636 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueWinter Simulation Conference · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldDecision Sciences
TopicScheduling and Timetabling Solutions
Canadian institutionsDefence Research and Development Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDiscrete event simulationEvent (particle physics)Computer scienceProcess (computing)Modeling and simulationMilitary personnelOutcome (game theory)Operations researchHuman resourcesAction (physics)Systems engineeringRisk analysis (engineering)EngineeringSimulationBusinessManagement

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The management of military human resources (HR) is a complex problem. Discrete event models of military HR systems are used by the Canadian Department of National Defence to provide military decision makers with greater knowledge of the outcome of possible courses of action. However, models of military HR systems have unique characteristics that most discrete event simulation software products do not cater to. Specifically, military HR models tend to be complex rule-based models, they process large amounts of data, and the ability to interconnect models is very desirable. This paper presents a novel discrete event simulation environment being developed by Defence Research and Development Canada called Person, Right Qualification, Right Place, Right Time Human Resources which is tailored to the particular needs of military HR modeling and simulation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.426
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.090
GPT teacher head0.363
Teacher spread0.273 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it