A new stratigraphic framework for the Gaspé Belt in southern Quebec: implications for the pre-Acadian Appalachians of eastern Canada
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The post-Taconian units in the Quebec and northern New Brunswick Appalachians constitute the Gaspé Belt and geological studies have mostly focussed on its eastern Quebec segment. Biostratigraphic data indicate that the succession in southern Quebec is no older than Late Silurian and extends into the Early Devonian. Two distinct stratigraphic assemblages are present. The first assemblage (Saint-Luc, Cranbourne, and Lac Aylmer formations, and Glenbrooke Group) unconformably overlies the Humber and Dunnage zones. The units show a basal alluvial conglomerate that passes progressively to deeper marine facies upsection, which have recorded a post-Late Silurian transgressive event. The second assemblage (Saint-Francis Group and Frontenac Formation) is faulted against either Dunnage units or autochthonous post-Taconian units. It locally unconformably overlies units of the Dunnage Zone; the succession shows progressively deeper marine conditions upsection and also has recorded a post-Late Silurian transgressive event. The biostratigraphic framework suggests that some of the units that were assumed to be vertically stacked are rather laterally equivalent. Independant evidence supports the hypothesis that the Gaspé Belt in southern Quebec formed after the collapse of the Taconian orogen in Late Silurian time. This event is ascribed to the Salinian Orogeny. The framework from southern Quebec is incorporated in a regional scenario. The Gaspé Belt experienced a PridolianLochkovian sea-level rise. In Pragian time, shallower marine conditions were established in southern Quebec, whereas in the Gaspé Peninsula, the shallower conditions only occurred in early Emsian time.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".