MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2120279386

La noción de cientificidad en la teoría de situaciones didácticas

2013· article· es· W2120279386 on OpenAlexaff
Gustavo Barallobres

Bibliographic record

VenueRedalyc (Universidad Autónoma del Estado de México) · 2013
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEducational theories and practices
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPhilosophy
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

"Una de las características fundamentales de las disciplinas que aspiran a elaborar un cuerpo de saberes reconocidos socialmente, entre ellas la didáctica de las matemáticas, es la intención de dar un estatus “científico” a los saberes producidos. Pero, ¿en qué consiste este estatus? ¿Cuáles son los criterios de cientificidad adoptados y cómo se definen? ¿Cuál es el modelo de ciencia implícito o explícito? Proponemos una reflexión sobre el estatus de los saberes producidos en didáctica de las matemáticas en el contexto de la Teoría de Situaciones Didácticas (Brousseau, 1998)."

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.032
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.038
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.032
Threshold uncertainty score0.168

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0320.038
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0040.003
Science and technology studies0.0050.056
Scholarly communication0.0150.011
Open science0.0020.010
Research integrity0.0030.006
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.298
Teacher spread0.283 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRedalyc (Universidad Autónoma del Estado de México)Same topicEducational theories and practicesFrench-language works237,207