MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2120338298 · doi:10.1109/noms.2008.4575158

CyberPlanner: A comprehensive toolkit for network service providers

2008· article· en· W2120338298 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicSoftware System Performance and Reliability
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
FundersUniversity of WaterlooPohang University of Science and Technology
KeywordsService providerComputer scienceService (business)Customer Service AssuranceKey (lock)DimensioningProcess managementService designComputer networkBusinessComputer securityMarketingEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

With the increased network size and diversity, and the proliferation in applications and services, the network service providers are faced with a flood of information from many levels of their network and service operations, often in uncorrelated forms. At the same time, the focus of network services is shifting from managing networks to managing services and customers. CyberPlanner is a comprehensive toolkit for the collection, correlation and filtering of metrics at all levels of a network service providerpsilas business. In this paper, we present its concept, modeling methodologies and implementation. Experience gained from CyberPlanner testing and operations in both academic and industrial settings demonstrates its effectiveness and potential in assisting many key provider operations such as customer-oriented trouble diagnostics, network dimensioning and upgrading, service planning and business revenue forecasting.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.595
Threshold uncertainty score0.417

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.244
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it