Exact and Closed-Form Error Performance Analysis for Hard MMSE-SIC Detection in MIMO Systems
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We investigate the exact error performance of hard minimum mean-squared error (MMSE) detection possibly with successive interference cancellation (SIC) in multiple-input multiple-output (MIMO) systems. To facilitate the analysis, we start with an exact bit-error rate (BER) analysis for a general system with decision statistic, z=ax+u, where a>;0, x is the transmitted signal, and u is an arbitrarily distributed noise component which is possibly dependent on the signal component x. For this general system, we derive the exact and closed-form BER expressions for M-ary pulse amplitude modulation (PAM) and arbitrary rectangular quadrature amplitude modulation (QAM), which include the well-known BER result of as a special case. Furthermore, by formulating the MIMO MMSE decision statistics in the same form as z in the general system, we derive the exact and closed-form instantaneous BER and symbol-error rate (SER) expressions for MIMO hard MMSE detection with/without SIC employing PAM and QAM. Finally, the validity of our derived error probability expressions is verified through extensive Monte Carlo simulations and the results reported in the literature.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it