MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2120383636 · doi:10.1029/2007jc004607

Modeling the diurnal variability of sea surface temperatures

2008· article· en· W2120383636 on OpenAlexaff
Sam Pimentel, Keith Haines, Nancy Nichols

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicOceanographic and Atmospheric Processes
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
FundersNatural Environment Research CouncilSight Research UKWoods Hole Oceanographic Institution
KeywordsDiurnal cycleDiurnal temperature variationEnvironmental scienceMooringClimatologySea surface temperatureSatelliteMixed layerAtmospheric sciencesMeteorologyGeologyOceanographyGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this study a one‐dimensional mixed layer ocean model is customized for the purpose of estimating the diurnal signal of temperature in the near‐surface ocean layer, generically referred to as sea surface temperature (SST). The model is initially run with data from three mooring locations. It is then demonstrated how operational forecast data sets can be utilized to estimate diurnal signals over a wide area. Daily diurnal variability maps are produced for a weeklong period over the Atlantic Ocean. These maps highlight the transient nature of diurnal SST signals with day to day changes in their magnitude and spatial distribution. The resulting diurnal variability maps are evaluated using a combination of infrared and microwave satellite‐derived SST observations taken over the day. These matchups result in a mean error of 0.09°C and a standard deviation of 0.54°C. Advantages of modeling the diurnal cycle as opposed to using a persistence assumption are discussed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.214
Threshold uncertainty score0.816

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.284
Teacher spread0.248 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations24
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Geophysical Research AtmospheresSame topicOceanographic and Atmospheric ProcessesFrench-language works237,207