MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2120390128 · doi:10.1139/p00-092

The ClO bond in chlorine oxides: Electronic structure and empirical force constants

2001· article· en· W2120390128 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Rafael Escribano, R.G. Mosteo, Pedro C. Gómez

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Physics · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicCrystallography and molecular interactions
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhysicsChlorineChemical bondMoleculeForce constantDensity functional theoryBondPhysical chemistryThermodynamicsComputational chemistryAtomic physicsQuantum mechanicsChemistryOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The nature of the Cl–O chemical bond is investigated in a series of chlorine oxides. Several parameters, both experimental and theoretical, are used for this purpose. The geometrical structure is taken from the literature. Force constants are derived from experimental frequencies for 11 molecules, where data from isotopic species, up to a number of 52, are used. Also a topological study of the B3LYP/6-311+G(2d) electron density is carried out. All the parameters mentioned are related and discussed to analyse the different kinds of Cl–O bonds, and a classification is put forward, in which three different types of Cl–O bonds are found.PACS No.: 31.10tz

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.815
Threshold uncertainty score0.971

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.245
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of PhysicsSame topicCrystallography and molecular interactionsFrench-language works237,207