MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2120391204 · doi:10.1109/pac.1993.308652

Operation of a high-power CW klystrode with the RFQ1 facility

2002· article· en· W2120391204 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicParticle accelerators and beam dynamics
Canadian institutionsAtomic Energy (Canada)
FundersLos Alamos National Laboratory
KeywordsAmplifierPower (physics)Electrical engineeringMode (computer interface)Linear particle acceleratorEngineeringComputer scienceOperating systemPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A high-power klystrode RF system for the RFQ1 facility at the Chalk River Laboratories has been manufactured by Continental Electronics corporation, Dallas using klystrode amplifier tubes developed by Varian, San Carlos. The system consists of two units, each capable of 250 kW in pulsed or CW mode. The two units can be operated independently to drive two separate accelerator structures, or together in a master/slave combination to drive one structure. This system is the first high-power klystrode to power a CW accelerator, and is a significant step in high-power klystrode development, increasing the average power per tube by a factor of 5 (to 250 kW). Commissioning, initial operation of one unit of this system with the RFQ1 facility, and data obtained to date, is described.< <ETX xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">&gt;</ETX>

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.130
Threshold uncertainty score0.403

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.174
Teacher spread0.166 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicParticle accelerators and beam dynamicsFrench-language works237,207