A Flexible Approach to Strained Sandwich Compounds: Chiral [1]Ferrocenophanes with Boron, Gallium, Silicon, and Tin in Bridging Positions
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The enantiomerically pure dibromoferrocene 3 [(Sp,Sp )-1,1'-dibromo-2,2'-di(isopropyl)ferrocene], equipped with two iPr groups in α positions, was prepared using known "Ugi amine" chemistry. Species 3 was targeted in order to gain access to new [1]ferrocenophanes ([1]FCPs) to be used as monomers for ring-opening polymerization. The iPr groups on the sandwich unit were introduced to stabilize bridging moieties, as well as to increase solubilities of targeted metallopolymers. The planar chiral dibromide 3 can quantitatively be lithiated at 0°C [2 equiv nBuLi, hexanes/thf (9:1), 30 min]. Salt-metathesis reactions with respective element dichloride species gave chiral [1]FCPs with a variety of bridging moieties [ERx =Ga[2-(Me2NCH2)C6H4] (4 a), SiMe2 (4 b), SntBu2 (4 c), BNiPr2 (4 d)]. The new [1]FCPs were fully characterized including single-crystal X-ray analysis. The stabilizing iPr groups on the Cp rings increase the thermal stabilities of 4 b-d compared to known [1]FCPs, equipped with the same bridging moieties. All three compounds 4 b-d are volatile and could be isolated by vacuum sublimation. Our new approach to [1]FCPs has the potential to overcome many of the existing difficulties in ferrocenophane chemistry, such as limited stability of starting monomers and low solubilities of resulting polyferrocenes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".