MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2120438786 · doi:10.1109/icst.2011.62

Implementing and Evaluating a Runtime Conformance Checker for Mobile Agent Systems

2011· article· en· W2120438786 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicMobile Agent-Based Network Management
Canadian institutionsOntario Tech UniversityQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsExecutableComputer scienceConformance testingModel checkingConformance checkingProgramming languageSoftware engineeringSet (abstract data type)Process (computing)SoftwareDistributed computingOperating systemBusiness processWork in processEngineeringBusiness process modeling

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A Mobile Agent System (MAS) is a special kind of distributed system in which the agent software can move from one physical host to another. This paper describes a new approach, together with its implementation and evaluation, for checking the conformance of a MAS with respect to an executable model. In order to check the effectiveness of our conformance check, we have built a mutation-based evaluation framework. Part of the framework is a set of 29 new mutation operators for mobile agent systems. Our conformance checking approach is used to compare the mutated agents with the executable model and determine nonconformance. Our experimental results suggest that our approach holds promise for the generation and detection of non-equivalent mutants.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.958
Threshold uncertainty score0.553

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.069
GPT teacher head0.300
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMobile Agent-Based Network ManagementFrench-language works237,207