MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2120478862 · doi:10.1101/sqb.2008.73.030

Complementary and Independent Function for Hoxb4 and Bmi1 in HSC Activity

2008· article· en· W2120478862 on OpenAlexafffund
Amélie Faubert, Jalila Chagraoui, Nadine Mayotte, M. Fréchette, Norman N. Iscove, R. Keith Humphries, Guy Sauvageau

Bibliographic record

VenueCold Spring Harbor Symposia on Quantitative Biology · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation
Canadian institutionsHôpital Maisonneuve-RosemontUniversity of TorontoOntario Institute for Cancer ResearchBC Cancer AgencyUniversité de MontréalUniversity of British ColumbiaInstitute for Research in Immunology and Cancer
FundersNational Cancer InstituteNational Institutes of HealthCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchTerry Fox Foundation
KeywordsLibrary scienceManagementGerontologyMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Self-renewal implies the coordination between cell division and fate such that for at least one progeny, cell differentiation, proliferative senescence, and apoptosis are excluded.In contrast to mouse embryonic stem cells that undergo symmetrical self-renewal divisions in response to leukemia inhibitory factor (LIF) and bone morphogenetic protein (BMP) signaling, most adult stem cells have the capacity to undergo two distinct types of self-renewal divisions: symmetrical and asymmetrical (Shen et al. 2002).In the hematopoietic system, HSCs undergo at least two rounds of mobilization that largely overlap with changes in proliferative status: Indeed, most HSCs are in cycle and symmetrically self-renew (thus expand) at a specific time in the mouse fetal liver (FL) and they then switch to a more quiescent program later in the bone marrow environment where the population is maintained for the entire life of the animal (no expansion, but maintenance of the population).Whether this maintenance phase is established by a balance between symmetrical self-renewal and stem cell loss, by asymmetric self-renewal division, or a combination of these processes remains unclear.In adult mice, HSC symmetrical self-renewal divisions can be experimentally triggered (reactivation of an embryonic program?) under specific conditions such as during the early phase following HSC transplantation (Pawliuk et al. 1996;Antonchuk et al. 2001), and this can be dramatically enhanced upon the engineered overexpression of the Hoxb4 transcription factor or other homeobox genes (Sauvageau et al. 1995;Thorsteinsdottir et al. 1999Thorsteinsdottir et al. , 2002;;Antonchuk et al. 2001Antonchuk et al. , 2002;;Krosl et al. 2003;Cellot et al. 2007;Ohta et al. 2007).Recent studies have documented that at least two different stem cell populations with more or less equal dif-ferentiation potential can be prospectively isolated.These include the long-term repopulating hematopoietic stem cells (LTR-HSCs) that supply hematopoiesis for the life span of the animal and the short-term repopulating HSCs (STR-HSCs) that contribute to repopulation for up to 3 months after transplantation (Morrison et al. 1997;Christensen and Weissman 2001;Wognum et al. 2003).Until recently, however, this property of short-term versus long-term repopulation was limited to phenotypically defined populations, but new studies have validated, at the single-cell level, the concept that the HSC compartment is highly heterogeneous and includes STR-HSCs and LTR-HSCs (Dykstra et al. 2007; N.N.Iscove, pers.comm.).In these studies, single STR-HSCs could provide multilineage reconstitution for up to 3-4 months posttransplantation, whereas LTR-HSCs contributed to lifelong repopulation.This level of blood cell production, estimated at above 10 12 progeny per STR-HSC, argues that these cells can extensively self-renew, thus introducing the notion (of N.N.Iscove) that it is the ability to sustain self-renewal rather than self-renewal itself that distinguishes LTR-HSCs from STR-HSCs.Together, these data suggest the existence of two mandatory components that define self-renewal (SR) in LTR-HSCs: one that coordinates fate with cell division (referred to as "execution of SR") and one that ensures the sustainability of this execution through cell divisions (referred to as "sustainability of SR").Several observations suggest that although Hoxb4 overexpression enhances the execution of SR in defined conditions, the Polycomb group (PcG) gene Bmi1 may be critical for regulating the sustainability of this process.Indeed, by phenotypical analysis, Bmi1 -/-HSCs are present in normal Complementary and Independent Function for Hoxb4 and Bmi1 in HSC Activity

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.017

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.052
GPT teacher head0.314
Teacher spread0.261 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations16
Published2008
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCold Spring Harbor Symposia on Quantitative Biology→Same topicHematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation→French-language works237,207→