Pamidronate in Children and Adolescents with Osteogenesis Imperfecta: Effect of Treatment Discontinuation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
CONTEXT: Cyclical iv pamidronate is a widely used symptomatic therapy of osteogenesis imperfecta (OI). What happens after treatment discontinuation is unknown. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to assess the effect of pamidronate discontinuation in pediatric patients with moderate to severe OI types I, III, and IV. DESIGN: This was an open-label controlled and observational study in patients who had received pamidronate for more than 3 yr. SETTING: This study was performed at a pediatric metabolic bone research unit. PATIENTS: In the controlled study, 12 pairs of patients were matched for age, OI severity, and duration of pamidronate treatment. Pamidronate was stopped in one patient of each pair; the other continued to receive treatment. In the observational study, 38 OI patients were examined (mean age, 13.8 yr). INTERVENTION: The intervention was discontinuation of pamidronate treatment for 2 yr. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The main outcome measures were lumbar spine bone mineral content and areal bone mineral density (aBMD), biochemical markers of bone metabolism, fracture incidence, and clinical evaluation. RESULTS: In the controlled study, bone resorption activity was higher after treatment discontinuation. Bone mineral content continued to increase in both groups. aBMD z-scores decreased in the untreated group, but increased in the continuation cohort. Fracture rates and functional status were similar between groups. In the observational study, bone resorption activity increased after treatment discontinuation, but remained significantly lower than in untreated OI patients. Bone mineral content and aBMD continued to increase, whereas aBMD z-scores decreased. Changes were faster in patients who continued growing. CONCLUSIONS: Bone metabolism is still suppressed 2 yr after pamidronate discontinuation. Bone mass gains continue after treatment is stopped, but lumbar spine aBMD increases less than in healthy subjects. The size of these effects is growth dependent.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".