MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2120506696 · doi:10.1109/igarss.2007.4423520

Statistical classification methodology of SHOALS 3000 backscatter to mapping coastal benthic habitats

2007· preprint· en· W2120506696 on OpenAlexafffund
Antoine Collin, Antoine Cottin, Bernard Long, P. Kuus, John E. Clark, Philippe Archambault, Gunho Sohn, John Miller

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicUnderwater Acoustics Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of New BrunswickUniversité du QuébecYork UniversityUniversité du Québec à RimouskiInstitut National de la Recherche Scientifique
FundersFisheries and Oceans CanadaInstitut national de la recherche scientifique
KeywordsShoalBathymetryBackscatter (email)HydrographyBenthic habitatLidarRemote sensingSonarBenthic zoneGeologyGround truthEnvironmental scienceOceanographyComputer scienceArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Scanning Hydrographic Operational Airborne LiDAR Survey (SHOALS) consists of a bathymetric LiDAR system which provides high precision measurements of water depth. Even though the acquisition is focused on depth accuracy, the return signal, i.e. waveform, contains other relevant information because of integration signatures from the water surface, the water column and the sea-bed. This paper highlights the benthic characterization in extracting statistical parameters derived from the bottom backscatter. In applying multivariate analysis (K-means), it is significantly proven that signals derived from habitat, described as statistically homogeneous throughout ground-truth analysis, are (1) similar within an intra-habitat view, while they are (2) different between themselves.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.582
Threshold uncertainty score0.991

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.231
GPT teacher head0.382
Teacher spread0.151 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2007
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicUnderwater Acoustics ResearchFrench-language works237,207