MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2120518017 · doi:10.1002/prot.20286

Explicit‐chain model of native‐state hydrogen exchange: Implications for event ordering and cooperativity in protein folding

2004· article· en· W2120518017 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueProteins Structure Function and Bioinformatics · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicProtein Structure and Dynamics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoUniversity Health Network
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCooperativityProtein foldingChemistryFolding (DSP implementation)ThermodynamicsLattice proteinHelix (gastropod)CrystallographyDownhill foldingEquilibrium unfoldingKineticsFolding funnelNative statePhi value analysisChemical physicsPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Native-state hydrogen exchange experiments on several proteins have revealed partially unfolded conformations with diverse stabilities. These equilibrium observations have been used to support kinetic arguments that folding proceeds via a sequential "pathway." This interpretative logic is evaluated here by analyzing the relationship between thermodynamic behavior and folding kinetics in a class of simplified lattice protein models. The chain models studied have varying degrees of cooperative interplay (coupling) between local helical conformational preference and favorable nonlocal interactions. When model cooperativity is high, as native conditions are weakened, "isotherms" of free energy of exchange for residues belonging to the same helix merge together before global unfolding. The point of merger depends on the model energetic favorability of the helix. This trend is similar to the corresponding experimental observations. Kinetically, we find that the ordering of helix formation in the very last stage of native core assembly tends to follow the stabilities of their converged isotherms. In a majority (but not all) of folding trajectories, the final assembly of helices that are thermodynamically more stable against exchange precedes that of helices that are less stable against exchange. These model features are in partial agreement with common experimental interpretations. However, the model results also underscore the ensemble nature of the folding process: the kinetics of helix formation is not a discrete, strictly "all-or-none" process as that envisioned by certain non-explicit-chain models. Helices generally undergo many cycles of partial formation and dissolution before their conformations are fixed in the final assembly stage of folding, a kinetic stage that takes up only approximately 2% of the average folding time in the present model; and the ordering of the helices' final assembly in some trajectories can be different from the dominant ordering stipulated by the exchange isotherms.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.341
Threshold uncertainty score0.644

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.238
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it