Stability of relevant plasma protein activities in cryosupernatant plasma units during refrigerated storage for up to 5 days postthaw
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Cryosupernatant plasma (CSP) is used in Canada for plasma exchange in thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura. The refrigerated storage time for thawed CSP is limited in many areas to not more than 24 hours postthaw. Because large volumes of CSP are needed for plasma exchange, procedural postponement can lead to product wastage. To determine if CSP storage could be extended, we measured coagulation-related activities in CSP thawed and stored at 1 to 6°C for up to 5 days. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Thirty-six CSP units were thawed, refrigerated, and sampled aseptically at 0, 24, 48, and 120 hours postthaw. Clotting factor activities (Factor [F]V, FVII, FVIII, and fibrinogen) and prothrombin time were measured using an automated coagulation analyzer, and von Willebrand factor (vWF) and ADAMTS13 activities using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. RESULTS: Fibrinogen, FVIII, and vWF activities were unchanged from thaw values after 120 hours of storage; ADAMTS13, FV, and FVII activities were significantly lower than at thaw, but mean reductions were only -2.6, -7.7, and -12%, respectively. Losses were proportionately greater in the first 24 hours of refrigerated storage. CONCLUSIONS: Extending the refrigerated storage of CSP from 1 to 5 days had little impact on product quality. The retention of more than 97% of initial mean ADAMTS13 activity after 5 days of refrigerated storage suggests that the shelf life of thawed refrigerated CSP could be extended without meaningful losses of its likely most important ingredients. CSP postthaw storage could be aligned to that of refrigerated thawed frozen plasma, currently available for transfusion in some jurisdictions for up to 5 days postthaw.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".