Validation of the use of phenylhydrazine hydrochloride (PHZ) for experimental manipulation of haematocrit and plasma haemoglobin in birds
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The levels of haematocrit (Hct) and plasma haemoglobin (Hb) vary markedly through the annual cycle of birds, as well as among individuals at all life‐stages (embryos, chicks, adults). It is thus surprising that the functional, fitness‐related consequences of this variation are poorly understood. Putative ‘adaptive’ variation in these haematological traits has been associated with varying demands for aerobic capacity and oxygen transport, for example during migration, winter acclimatization, with increasing altitude, or during parental care. It has also been proposed that changes in Hct might reflect ‘costs’ of parental investment, for example during ‘reproductive anaemia’. However, almost all studies to date have been correlative. Here we describe a series of experiments that validate the use of phenylhydrazine hydrochloride (PHZ) for the transient, reversible experimental manipulation of Hct and Hb in birds. A single bolus injection (12.5 μg PHZ/g body weight delivered via intra‐muscular injection) caused a rapid decrease in Hct and plasma Hb within 24 h, from pretreatment values of 50–54% to 40–44% in non‐breeding Zebra Finches Taenipoygia guttata and European Starlings Sturnus vulgaris, and to 35% in breeding female Zebra Finches, changes within the normal physiological range. Hct and Hb returned to pre‐injection levels within 5–10 days of treatment. Changes in plasma Hb paralleled those for Hct. We suggest that PHZ treatment provides a widely applicable technique for use in experimental work to establish relationships between haematological status, aerobic capacity, workload (e.g. migration, parental care, thermoregulation), individual quality (of both adults and chicks) and trade‐offs such as costs of reproduction.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".