MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2120572095 · doi:10.3732/ajb.0800239

Pathogenesis of bryophyte hosts by the ascomycete <i>Atradidymella muscivora</i>

2009· article· en· W2120572095 on OpenAlexaff
Marie L. Davey, A. Tsuneda, Randolph S. Currah

Bibliographic record

VenueAmerican Journal of Botany · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicLichen and fungal ecology
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiologyHyphaBotanyPopulationBryophyteFungusAppressorium

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Atradidymella muscivora (Pleosporales) is a bryophyte pathogen that infects the mosses Aulacomnium palustre, Hylocomium splendens, and Polytrichum juniperinum. Light and scanning electron microscopy and extracellular enzyme production were used to characterize the interactions between this fungus and its native hosts and the model host Funaria hygrometrica. Penetration was direct via hyphae or appressoria, and hosts responded by forming layered, darkly pigmented deposits at penetration sites, similar to the papillae formed by vascular plants in response to fungal infection. Infected hosts gradually became chlorotic as hyphae grew intracellularly, presumably killing host cells. Pycnidia of the Phoma anamorph (P. muscivora) and uniloculate pseudothecia were initiated as tightly packed masses of stromatic dematiaceous hyphae within a single host cell. Mature pycnidia and pseudothecia were erumpent. A new microniche among bryophilous fungi is described, whereby A. muscivora supplants the gemmae of Aul. palustre and exploits the normal nutrient-flow of the moss gametophyte. Atradidymella muscivora produced both cellulases and soluble polyphenolic oxidases, allowing it to also function as a saprobe and degrade the cell walls of bryophytes. The saprophytic and pathogenic abilities of A. muscivora suggest it may play a role in nutrient cycling, population dynamics, and small-scale disturbances in boreal ecosystems.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.928
Threshold uncertainty score0.143

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.192
Teacher spread0.187 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations30
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAmerican Journal of BotanySame topicLichen and fungal ecologyFrench-language works237,207