MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2120574306 · doi:10.7202/007930ar

Les minorités nationales : volonté, désir, homéostasie optimale

2004· article· fr· W2120574306 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Éric Schwimmer

Bibliographic record

VenueAnthropologie et Sociétés · 2004
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicReligious Education and Schools
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolitical scienceHumanitiesPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Un fondement possible de l’analyse anthropologique de l’être humain de l’avenir serait la philosophie de Sloterdijk qui renouvelle celle de Nietzsche. Si l’on prend comme exemple d’une telle analyse le cas des « minorités nationales » des États-nations, les données semblent dessiner la coexistence négociée comme le modèle de base du posthumanisme. Ce modèle, exigeant beaucoup de complicité entre les ethnies et niveaux hiérarchiques, promet d’amener des combats mondiaux d’auto-détermination et dépendra beaucoup des structures intermédiaires qui communiquent entre les communautés. L’article analyse en détail les rôles des intermédiaires et la nouvelle philosophie qui sous-tendent ces rôles, où le souverainisme tiendra le rôle clef d’agent de sécurité des mouvements alternatifs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.647
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.004
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0220.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.298
GPT teacher head0.603
Teacher spread0.306 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAnthropologie et SociétésSame topicReligious Education and SchoolsFrench-language works237,207