MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2120607659 · doi:10.1109/crv.2006.14

Automated Detection of Unusual Events on Stairs

2006· article· en· W2120607659 on OpenAlexaff
Jasper Snoek, Jesse Hoey, Liam Stewart, Rich Zemel

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAnomaly Detection Techniques and Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsStairsHidden Markov modelBackground subtractionComputer scienceConditional random fieldSegmentationAffine transformationArtificial intelligenceSet (abstract data type)Markov random fieldComputationData setPattern recognition (psychology)Field (mathematics)Optical flowActivity recognitionSubtractionComputer visionImage segmentationPixelImage (mathematics)AlgorithmMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents a method for automatically detecting and recognising unusual events on stairs from video data. The motivation is to provide a tool for biomedical researchers to rapidly find and analyse the events of interest within large quantities of video data. Our system identifies potential sequences containing anomalies, and reduces the amount of data that needs to be searched by a human. We apply adaptive background subtraction to segment the person using the stairs, followed by affine flow computation over the segmented region. A hidden Markov model (HMM) is then used to analyse the temporal progression of the affine features. A single HMM is trained on sequences of normal stair use, and a threshold is used to detect unusual events in new data. We also introduce a temporal segmentation method using a conditional random field (CRF). We demonstrate our system on a data set with three persons.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.888
Threshold uncertainty score0.174

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.243
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations21
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAnomaly Detection Techniques and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207