Cerebral autoregulation is preserved in postural tachycardia syndrome
Bibliographic record
Abstract
To test whether cerebral autoregulation is impaired in patients with postural tachycardia syndrome (POTS), we evaluated 17 healthy control subjects and 27 patients with POTS. Blood pressure, heart rate, and cerebral blood velocity (transcranial Doppler) were recorded at rest and during 80 degree head-up tilt (HUT). Static cerebral autoregulation, as assessed from the change in cerebrovascular resistance during HUT, was the same in POTS and in controls. The properties of dynamic cerebral autoregulation were inferred from transfer gain, coherence, and phase of the relationship between blood pressure and cerebral blood velocity estimated from filtered data segments (0.02-0.8 Hz). Dynamic cerebral autoregulation of patients with POTS did not differ from that of controls. The patients' dynamic cerebral autoregulation did not change over the course of HUT, despite increased tachycardia suggestive of worsening orthostatic stress. Inflation of military anti-shock trouser pants substantially reduced the tachycardia of patients with POTS without affecting cerebral autoregulation. Symptoms of orthostatic intolerance were reduced in one-half of the patients following military anti-shock trouser pants inflation. We conclude that cerebral perfusion and autoregulation in many patients with POTS do not differ from that of normal control subjects.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".