MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2120619222 · doi:10.1002/mus.10454

Peripheral nerve fascicles: Anatomy and clinical relevance

2003· review· en· W2120619222 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueMuscle & Nerve · 2003
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPeripheral Nerve Disorders
Canadian institutionsMcGill University Health CentreMontreal Neurological Institute and Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFascicleAnatomyNerve rootPeripheral nervePeripheralMedicineMagnetic resonance neurographyNeurosciencePsychologyMagnetic resonance imaging

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Within a peripheral nerve, the individual nerve fibers are grouped together in fascicles. Whether there is somatotopic organization within these fascicles has long been of interest, the subject of many investigations, and somewhat controversial. Evidence from diverse sources now points to important somatotopic clustering of nerve fibers within most of the length of the nerve. Information is lacking regarding proximal segments, particularly the plexus and spinal nerve root levels. As a result of this somatotopic arrangement, partial focal nerve lesions can produce restricted clinical deficits that defy the classic rules of localization. Examples of such restricted nerve lesions are provided in this review. Recognition of fascicle somatotopy is also important in the surgical approach to disorders of peripheral nerves.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.986
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.002
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.058
GPT teacher head0.392
Teacher spread0.334 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it