End-to-End Performance of Robust Multiple Description Scalar Quantizer
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Transmissions over hybrid wireline-wireless networks suffer both packet losses and bit errors. To facilitate delay-sensitive audio/video communications over hybrid networks, low-delay error recovery techniques, such as forward error correction (FEC) and multiple description coding (MDC), are utilized to provide protection against bit errors and packet losses, respectively. As a means of joint source-channel coding, the robust multiple description scalar quantizer (RMDSQ) was introduced to combat both packet losses and bit errors. In this paper, a novel RMDSQ system is proposed by utilizing both MDC and FEC-based techniques. In the sense of rate distortion, end-to-end performance of the RMDSQ system against packet losses and bit errors is compared with that of individual FEC and MDC-based techniques. Instead of the traditional two-state Gilbert channel model, a three-state Markov chain is proposed to model hybrid networks and work as the testbed. Experimental results show that the proposed RMDSQ system achieves higher robustness against increasing packet losses and bit errors. In contrast, FEC-based techniques achieve better performance against bit errors; however, their performance deteriorates significantly due to packet losses.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".