Reducing Cerebral Emboli During Cardiopulmonary Bypass
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Neurologic injury is a common complication of cardiac surgery and is associated with significant morbidity, mortality, and resource utilization. The incidence varies widely according to the definition used, patient age, and complexity of surgery. The manifestations of neurologic injury are broad, ranging from subtle neurocognitive dysfunction to frank stroke. An increasing amount of evidence points to cerebral embolization during cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) as the principal etiologic factor of these neurologic complications. Cerebral emboli may be composed of atherosclerotic debris, calcium, air, fat, platelet thrombi, or CPB tubing. Advancements in perfusion technology, CPB techniques and surgical strategies may lead to a reduction in neurologic injury during cardiac surgery. In the current paper, we discuss the pathophysiology of neurologic injury after cardiac surgery and methods of reducing cerebral embolization. Reducing emboli and neurologic injury during CPB requires a multidisciplinary approach that includes several simple diagnostic and therapeutic strategies. Reducing cerebral emboli should be a major goal for future research in the fields of cardiac anesthesia, surgery and perfusion.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.005 | 0.003 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it