MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2120679717 · doi:10.5539/ibr.v7n3p137

Empirical Investigation of Free Cash Flow Hypothesis: Evidence from Jordanian Capital Market

2014· article· en· W2120679717 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Ziad Mohammad Zurigat, Iaad I.S. Mustafa Sartawi, Hasan Aleassa

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Business Research · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicCorporate Finance and Governance
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFree cash flowDividend policyDividendDebtLeverage (statistics)Monetary economicsPanel dataCash flowEconomicsAgency costBusinessFinancial economicsEconometricsFinanceCorporate governanceMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study aims to investigate free cash flow hypothesis proposed by Jensen (1986). Data pertaining to 102non-financial firms listed on ASE during the period of 1998–2009 are analyzed using pooled and panel datamethods. Contrary to Jensen (1986) proposition, we found that debt and dividend are not substitute techniquesfor mitigating agency costs of free cash flow in the Jordanian capital market, rather, they are complementary toeach other. However, debt is used more than dividend for stability consideration of dividend policy where the useof debt and dividend is largely affected by dividend smoothing and leverage target adjustment considerations.Moreover, we found that low growth firms use debt more than dividends.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.009
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.019

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.009
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.003
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.103
GPT teacher head0.313
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Business ResearchSame topicCorporate Finance and GovernanceFrench-language works237,207