MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2120681256 · doi:10.4212/cjhp.v58i4.315

Weathering Another “ Perfect Storm ” in Hospital Pharmacy

2005· article· en· W2120681256 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
James Mann

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Canadian Journal of Hospital Pharmacy · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicPatient Safety and Medication Errors
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCrashPharmacyQuality assuranceCrewMedical emergencyHealth careMedicineMinor (academic)StormForensic engineeringFamily medicineAeronauticsEngineeringMeteorologyGeographyComputer sciencePolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

1The 297 passengers and 12 crew all survived, and only minor injuries were sustained. At least 30 investigators from the Canadian Transportation Safety Board have been investigating the crash. 1 The effects of medication errors have often been compared to those of a plane crash since the number of medication-related deaths that occur annually in our health care system is comparable to the number resulting from many typical plane crashes. However, because fatal medication errors occur at many different sites, they are not subjected to the same quality assurance checks and improvements that society routinely expects after a plane crash. The health care community has been inundated with medication error reports for years, but the 1999 Institute of Medicine report 2

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.043
Threshold uncertainty score0.085

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0000.003
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.050
GPT teacher head0.382
Teacher spread0.332 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2005
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Canadian Journal of Hospital Pharmacy→Same topicPatient Safety and Medication Errors→French-language works237,207→