MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2120689455 · doi:10.1080/15419060600631326

Administration of FGF-2 to the Heart Stimulates Connexin-43 Phosphorylation at Protein Kinase C Target Sites

2006· article· en· W2120689455 on OpenAlexafffund
Wattamon Srisakuldee, Barbara E. Nickel, Robert R. Fandrich, Zhisheng Jiang, Elissavet Kardami

Bibliographic record

VenueCell Communication & Adhesion · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicConnexins and lens biology
Canadian institutionsUniversity of ManitobaSt. Boniface Hospital
FundersNational Research Council CanadaCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsConnexinPhosphorylationProtein kinase CGap junctionBlotFibroblast growth factorCardioprotectionKinaseCell biologyMolecular biologyBiologyChemistryInternal medicineBiochemistryMedicineReceptorIschemiaIntracellular

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Fibroblast growth factor-2 (FGF-2) confers acute, preconditioning-like cardiac resistance to ischemic injury in a protein kinase C (PKC)-dependent fashion. One of the downstream targets of PKC is the gap junction protein connexin-43 (Cx43). We thus examined the effects of FGF-2 on Cx43 phosphorylation at specific PKC sites in the adult heart. Rat hearts perfused ex vivo for 20 min with an FGF-2-containing solution displayed increased levels of phosphorylated 44-45 kDa Cx43, assessed by western blotting. In addition, FGF-2 significantly upregulated phosphorylation of the PKC target serines 262 and 368 on Cx43 at intercalated disks, assessed using phosphospecific antibodies in immunolocalization and western blotting assays. Our data show that FGF-2, administered by perfusion, can alter the phosphorylation status of Cx43 at cardiomyocyte intercalated disks, and suggest a link between phosphorylation of Cx43 at specific PKC sites and FGF-2 cardioprotection.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.246
Teacher spread0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations30
Published2006
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCell Communication & AdhesionSame topicConnexins and lens biologyFrench-language works237,207