MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2120710153 · doi:10.1073/pnas.0407259102

Choice reaction time performance correlates with diffusion anisotropy in white matter pathways supporting visuospatial attention

2005· article· en· W2120710153 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAdvanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
Canadian institutionsMontreal Neurological Institute and Hospital
FundersNational Institute of Biomedical Imaging and BioengineeringNational Center for Research ResourcesNational Institute of Neurological Disorders and StrokeNational Institutes of HealthNational Cancer InstituteNational Institute on AgingGlaxoSmithKline
KeywordsFractional anisotropyPsychologyWhite matterCorpus callosumSuperior parietal lobuleNeuroscienceDiffusion MRIPrecuneusWorking memoryLateralization of brain functionParietal lobeFunctional magnetic resonance imagingAudiologyCognitionMedicineMagnetic resonance imaging

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Humans exhibit significant interindividual variability in behavioral reaction time (RT) performance yet the underlying neural mechanisms for this variability remain largely unknown. It has been proposed that interindividual variability in RT performance may be due to differences in white matter (WM) physiological properties, although such a relationship has never been demonstrated in cortical projection or association pathways in healthy young adults. Using diffusion tensor MRI (DTI), we sought to test whether diffusion tensor fractional anisotropy (FA), a measure of the orientational coherence of water self-diffusion, is regionally correlated with RT on a visual self-paced choice RT (CRT) task. CRT was found to be significantly correlated with FA in projection and association pathways supporting visuospatial attention including the right optic radiation, right posterior thalamus, and right medial precuneus WM. Significant correlations were also observed in left superior temporal sulcus WM and the left parietal operculum. The lateralization of the CRT-FA correlation to right visual and parietal WM pathways is consistent with the specialization of right visual and parietal cortices for visuospatial attention. The localization of the CRT-FA correlations to predominantly visual and parietal WM pathways, but not to motor pathways or the corpus callosum indicates that individual differences in visual CRT performance are associated with variations in the WM underlying the visuospatial attention network as opposed to pathways supporting motor movement or interhemispheric transmission.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.467
Threshold uncertainty score0.188

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.322
Teacher spread0.286 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it