MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2120715664 · doi:10.1186/gm220

Genome Medicine: past, present and future

2011· article· en· W2120715664 on OpenAlexaff
Charles Auffray, Timothy Caulfield, Muin J. Khoury, James R. Lupski, Matthias Schwab, Timothy D. Veenstra

Bibliographic record

VenueGenome Medicine · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGenomics and Rare Diseases
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersNational Center for Research ResourcesNational Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke
KeywordsGenomic medicineHuman geneticsGenome BiologyPersonalized medicineGenomicsGenomePrecision medicineData scienceTranslational bioinformaticsSection (typography)Computational biologyEngineering ethicsMedicineBiologyBioinformaticsGeneticsComputer scienceEngineeringGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

e field of genomic medicine continues to expand, driven by the efforts of numerous researchers around the world.To celebrate Genome Medicine's 2nd anniversary, we asked our Section Editors what they felt were the most exciting breakthroughs in research in the past 2 years and what the future of genomic medicine might hold.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.015
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.013
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.015
Threshold uncertainty score0.078

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0150.013
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.003
Science and technology studies0.0020.010
Scholarly communication0.0100.017
Open science0.0020.003
Research integrity0.0100.013
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.226
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations29
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGenome MedicineSame topicGenomics and Rare DiseasesFrench-language works237,207