MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2120730503 · doi:10.5539/res.v7n4p216

Tolerant Pedagogic Space as a Condition of Non-Violence Position Education among Elementary School Pupils

2015· article· en· W2120730503 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Ekaterina V. Mokeyeva, Venera G. Zakirova, Alfiya R. Masalimova

Bibliographic record

VenueReview of European Studies · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicPsychology of Development and Education
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersKazan Federal University
KeywordsPosition (finance)School violenceMathematics educationSpace (punctuation)Primary educationSchool educationPsychologyPedagogySociologySocial psychologyComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The purpose of article is to justify the necessity of tolerant educational space creation at elementary school as condition of non-violence position education of elementary school pupils. Essential characteristics of pedagogical ensuring education of non-violence position among elementary school pupils are revealed in the article. The features of tolerant educational space creation as conditions of non-violence position education among elementary school pupils in teaching and educational process at elementary school are revealed. Materials of the article can be useful for tutors and teachers of elementary schools, and also for the researchers dealing with problems of non-violence pedagogics.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.002
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.075
GPT teacher head0.437
Teacher spread0.362 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations21
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueReview of European StudiesSame topicPsychology of Development and EducationFrench-language works237,207