Arthroconidial formation in <b><i>Trichophyton raubitschekii</i></b>
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Arthroconidia produced by dermatophytic fungi are considered to be the primary cause of skin and nail infections in humans and animals. Trichophyton rubrum is currently the most common cause of tinea pedis all over the world. The common form of T. rubrum produces a cottony colony in cultures that is characteristically low in conidia formation. The attempts to produce arthroconidia in T. rubrum have shown little success so far. Recently, Trichophyton raubitschekii, an anthropophilic dermatophyte prevalent in Asia, Africa, and the Mediterranean, has been recognized as a variant of T. rubrum. In cultures, T. raubitschekii is characterized by a granular colony form, and an abundance of both micro- and macroconidia. The present study reveals a predominance of arthroconidia in two T. raubitschekii cultures isolated from clinical materials. These isolates were able to maintain arthroconidiation in bimonthly subcultures throughout the entire course of this study. The growth parameters for in vitro cultivation of arthroconidia are described here. Arthroconidia prepared from T. raubitschekii cultures showed greater than 95% germination within 21 h of suspension in phosphate-buffered saline. The availability of arthroconidia in T. raubitschekii cultures appears to offer a practical means of characterizing infective cells in T. rubrum.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it