MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2120816053 · doi:10.1142/s0218127411030003

BIFURCATION CONTROL FOR A CLASS OF LORENZ-LIKE SYSTEMS

2011· article· en· W2120816053 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Bifurcation and Chaos · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicChaos control and synchronization
Canadian institutionsWestern University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsLorenz systemControl theory (sociology)Biological applications of bifurcation theoryMathematicsNonlinear systemChaoticClass (philosophy)Limit (mathematics)Stability (learning theory)BifurcationChenHopf bifurcationSimple (philosophy)Applied mathematicsSaddle-node bifurcationLimit cycleControl (management)Computer scienceMathematical analysisAttractorPhysicsArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, a control method developed earlier is employed to consider controlling bifurcations in a class of Lorenz-like systems. Particular attention is focused on Hopf bifurcation control via linear and nonlinear stability analyses. The Lorenz system, Chen system and Lü system are studied in detail. Simple feedback controls are designed for controlling the stability of equilibrium solutions, limit cycles and chaotic motions. All formulas are derived in general forms including the system parameters. Computer simulation results are presented to confirm the analytical predictions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.739
Threshold uncertainty score0.303

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.239
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it