Portrait du recours aux services de santé mentale avant et après une tentative de suicide qui requiert une hospitalisation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Les services de santé ont un rôle important à jouer en matière de prévention du suicide. À partir de données médico-administratives, nous avons analysé les patrons de recours aux services de santé mentale avant et après une hospitalisation pour tentative de suicide, chez les Montréalais qui ont reçu un diagnostic de schizophrénie ou de dépression. Les résultats laissent poindre des avancés en matière de prévention, notamment chez les hommes avec un trouble concomitant d’abus de substances, reconnus comme particulièrement vulnérables. Par contre, d’autres constats inquiètent. L’urgence comme porte d’entrée aux services de santé mentale ne semble pas garante du recours aux services suivant une hospitalisation pour tentative de suicide. Des interventions sont requises en vue de faciliter l’accès et d’améliorer la coordination entre les différents services de santé.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".