MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2120834728 · doi:10.1109/vetecf.2002.1040610

Iterative parallel-trellis MAP equalizers with nonuniformly-spaced prefilters for sparse multipath channels

2003· article· en· W2120834728 on OpenAlexaff
F.K.H. Lee, P.J. McLane

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Wireless Communication Techniques
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIntersymbol interferenceAlgorithmTrellis (graph)Computer scienceMaximum a posteriori estimationMultipath propagationMinimum mean square errorMatched filterEqualization (audio)DemodulationControl theory (sociology)Channel (broadcasting)Decoding methodsMathematicsTelecommunicationsEstimatorDetectorMaximum likelihood

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A maximum a posteriori (MAP) equalizer is derived in this paper by formulating the forward/backward recursion MAP algorithm (i.e. the BCJR algorithm) on a parallel-trellis representation that was previously proposed for equalizing sparse multipath channels. Several enhancements are suggested to further improve the performance and/or reduce the complexity of the resultant MAP equalizer. Results show that the parallel-trellis MAP equalizers utilizing 2-state trellises are the predominant structures applicable to minimum-phase sparse multipath channels when binary phase shift keying (BPSK) modulation is assumed. However, for nonminimum-phase sparse multipath channels, prefiltering is generally indispensable and is accomplished using the feedforward filter (FFF) of a nonuniformly-spaced decision feedback equalizer (NU-DFE) optimized under the minimum mean square error (MMSE) criterion, which also preserves the sparseness of the resultant minimum-phase impulse response. The simplicity of the 2-state, parallel-trellis structure leads to a low computational load that is comparable to those of uniformly-spaced and nonuniformly-spaced tapped-delay-line (TDL) equalizers, but attains much superior performance over the latter types of equalizers. Moreover, iterations can be added to improve the accuracy of the inter-trellis intersymbol interference (ISI) estimates and the residual ISI estimates due to channel truncation, and are especially effective in mitigating the precursor ISI terms due to non-ideal prefiltering.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.628
Threshold uncertainty score0.917

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.257
Teacher spread0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced Wireless Communication TechniquesFrench-language works237,207