La petite fille et l’éléphant. Violences inconcevables, transfert et mise en récit 1
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Comment suppléer aux déchirures de la mémoire ? Comment raconter une violence extrême – physique ou psychologique – vécue dans un temps qui précède la parole, et alors qu’aucune possibilité de représentation et de récit n’existe ? Dans La petite fille et l’éléphant , j’émets l’hypothèse que la violence contre soi constitue une défense contre un état d’abandon psychique. La cure analytique pourrait être ce lieu qui permet à la fois la symbolisation de cet état d’abandon et la mise en récit de soi dans son rapport à des violences primitives. Partant de mes souvenirs et expériences cliniques, des témoignages apportés par des romanciers, philosophes et collègues psychanalystes, j’interroge ce que j’appelle « l’expérience de l’inconcevable » et propose une approche qui favorise la mise en récit de soi (qui inclut les silences de son passé) à partir du transfert.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.008 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.021 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".