MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2120843021 · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.92.102004

Constraints on Nucleon Decay via Invisible Modes from the Sudbury Neutrino Observatory

2004· article· en· W2120843021 on OpenAlexaffabout
S. N. Ahmed, A. E. Anthony, E. W. Beier, A. Bellerive, S. D. Biller, J. Boger, M. G. Boulay, M. G. Bowler, T. J. Bowles, S. J. Brice, T. V. Bullard, Y. D. Chan, M. Chen, X. Chen, B. T. Cleveland, G. A. Cox, X. Dai, F. Dalnoki‐Veress, P. J. Doe, R.S. Dosanjh, G. Doucas, M. R. Dragowsky, C. A. Duba, F. A. Duncan, M. Dunford, J. Dunmore, E. D. Earle, S. R. Elliott, H. C. Evans, G. T. Ewan, J. Farine, H. Fergani, F. Fleurot, J. A. Formaggio, M. M. Fowler, K. C. Frame, W. Frati, B. G. Fulsom, N. Gagnon, K. Graham, D. R. Grant, R. L. Hahn, James C. Hall, A. L. Hallin, E. D. Hallman, A. S. Hamer, W. B. Handler, C. K. Hargrove, P. J. Harvey, R. Hazama, K. M. Heeger, W. J. Heintzelman, J. Heise, R. L. Helmer, R.J. Hemingway, A. Hime, M. A. Howe, P. Jagam, N.A. Jelley, J. R. Klein, M. Kos, A. V. Krumins, T. Kutter, Christopher C. M. Kyba, H. Labranche, R. Lange, J. Law, I. Lawson, K. T. Lesko, J. R. Leslie, I. Levine, S. Luoma, R. MacLellan, Steve Majerus, H.‐B. Mak, J. Maneira, A. D. Marino, N. McCauley, A. B. McDonald, S. McGee, G. McGregor, C. Mifflin, K. K. S. Miknaitis, Guthrie Miller, B. A. Moffat, C. W. Nally, M. S. Neubauer, B. G. Nickel, A. J. Noble, E. B. Norman, N. S. Oblath, C. Okada, R. W. Ollerhead, J. L. Orrell, S. M. Oser, C. Ouellet, S. J. M. Peeters, A. W. P. Poon, B.C. Robertson, R. G. H. Robertson, E. Rollin, S. S. E. Rosendahl, Vadim Rusu, M. H. Schwendener, O. Simard, J. J. Simpson, C. J. Sims, D. Sinclair, P. Skensved, M. W. E. Smith, N. Starinsky, R. G. Stokstad, L. C. Stonehill, R. Tafirout, Y. Takeuchi, G. Tešić, M. Thomson, M. Thorman, R. Van Berg, R. G. Van de Water, C.J. Virtue, B. L. Wall, D. Waller, Chris Waltham, H. Wan Chan Tseung, D. L. Wark, N. West, J.B. Wilhelmy, J. F. Wilkerson, J. R. Wilson, P. Wittich, J.M. Wouters, M. Yeh, Κ. Zuber

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical Review Letters · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicNeutrino Physics Research
Canadian institutionsCarleton UniversityTRIUMFLaurentian UniversityUniversity of GuelphUniversity of British ColumbiaQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhysicsProton decayProtonNeutronNeutrinoNucleonNuclear physicsObservatoryAstrophysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Data from the Sudbury Neutrino Observatory have been used to constrain the lifetime for nucleon decay to ``invisible'' modes, such as $n\ensuremath{\rightarrow}3\ensuremath{\nu}$. The analysis was based on a search for $\ensuremath{\gamma}$ rays from the deexcitation of the residual nucleus that would result from the disappearance of either a proton or neutron from $^{16}\mathrm{O}$. A limit of ${\ensuremath{\tau}}_{\mathrm{inv}}>2\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}{10}^{29}\text{ }\text{ }\mathrm{yr}$ is obtained at 90% confidence for either neutron- or proton-decay modes. This is about an order of magnitude more stringent than previous constraints on invisible proton-decay modes and 400 times more stringent than similar neutron modes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.446
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.312
Teacher spread0.276 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations63
Published2004
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical Review LettersSame topicNeutrino Physics ResearchFrench-language works237,207