A Holonic Federated Sensor Management Framework for pervasive surveillance systems
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The increased popularity of the proactive security paradigm aggravated the need for pervasive surveillance systems. These systems are built using smart sensor networks which cover large areas of civilian concentration. Such networks need intelligent management systems to control the large number of sensor nodes and the large amount of data. Sensor Management Frameworks (SMF) aim to coordinate the sensor nodes in a manner that improves the process of system control and situation awareness. Large number of non-functional merits, i.e., autonomy, scalability, inter-operability, and others, can characterize SMFs. This paper proposes a taxonomy for these non-functional merits based on the design concepts. Furthermore, this paper discusses the important functional properties of such systems, and categorizes these functional properties according to their processing level. In addition, a scalable and adaptable control architecture that is applicable in a variety of sensor management applications with a focus on tactical surveillance is introduced. The proposed Holonic-Federated Sensor Management Framework (HF-SMF) mixes the advantages of the holonic and federated paradigms. Experimental results illustrate the performance of the proposed architecture and show that the proposed paradigm is highly scalable compared to the centralized one.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".