Increased sky coverage with optimal correction of tilt and tilt-anisoplanatism modes in laser-guide-star multiconjugate adaptive optics
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Laser-guide-star multiconjugate adaptive optics (MCAO) systems require natural guide stars (NGS) to measure tilt and tilt-anisoplanatism modes. Making optimal use of the limited number of photons coming from such, generally dim, sources is mandatory to obtain reasonable sky coverage, i.e., the probability of finding asterisms amenable to NGS wavefront (WF) sensing for a predefined WF error budget. This paper presents a Strehl-optimal (minimum residual variance) spatiotemporal reconstructor merging principles of modal atmospheric tomography and optimal stochastic control theory. Simulations of NFIRAOS, the first light MCAO system for the thirty-meter telescope, using ~500 typical NGS asterisms, show that the minimum-variance (MV) controller delivers outstanding results, in particular for cases with relatively dim stars (down to magnitude 22 in the H-band), for which low-temporal frame rates (as low as 16 Hz) are required to integrate enough flux. Over all the cases tested ~21 nm rms median improvement in WF error can be achieved with the MV compared to the current baseline, a type-II controller based on a double integrator. This means that for a given level of tolerable residual WF error, the sky coverage is increased by roughly 10%, a quite significant figure. The improvement goes up to more than 20% when compared with a traditional single-integrator controller.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".