MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Rotating Nonlinear Vortical Patterns on a Gamma Plane

2010· article· en· W2120891844 on OpenAlex
Oleg G. Derzho, Brad de Young

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueStudies in Applied Mathematics · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicOceanographic and Atmospheric Processes
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of Newfoundland
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRossby waveBarotropic fluidNonlinear systemStream functionPhysicsPlane (geometry)VorticityVortexRossby numberAsymmetryClassical mechanicsPotential vorticityCirculation (fluid dynamics)MechanicsGeometryMathematicsAtmospheric sciences

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Nonlinear barotropic vortical patterns on a γ ‐plane are investigated analytically. The solutions describe large‐scale Rossby waves rotating anticyclonically with zero circulation. The Rossby waves are predicted to rotate with a specific angular velocity. The stream function–vorticity relation is assumed to be nonlinear, which may lead to a pronounced asymmetry within the pattern. The similarity between the simulated patterns and the Antarctic Circumpolar Wave is highlighted.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.425
Threshold uncertainty score0.478

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.271
Teacher spread0.244 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it