MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2120898747 · doi:10.1109/inm.2005.1440837

Semantic techniques for reconfiguring and adapting networks in pervasive environments

2005· preprint· en· W2120898747 on OpenAlexaff
Mohamed Khedr, A. Karmouch, M. Ganna, Éric Horlait

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicService-Oriented Architecture and Web Services
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceOntologySemantic WebAdaptabilityContext (archaeology)Ubiquitous computingControl reconfigurationWorld Wide WebContext awarenessOrder (exchange)Semantic networkData scienceHuman–computer interactionArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Computing and networking technologies are becoming ever more pervasive in order to support their users' increasingly dynamic lifestyles. These technologies aim to increase the networks' awareness of their users' requirements. At the same time, they strive to reduce the amount of manual reconfiguration and explicit interaction between the users and the network resources. The main problem is the extreme difficulty in reconfiguring the network's resources at runtime and in adapting the network's behaviour automatically according to the changes happening in the surroundings. To address these issues, we investigated the use of the emerging semantic Web technologies, policies, and context information. We also developed an ontology-based reasoning machinery to address the problem of automated adaptability. In this paper, we provide an analysis of the ontologies we developed and the reasoning machinery required increasing the network's awareness of its context. We report on the experiments we conducted to evaluate the techniques we are proposing.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.944
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.234
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicService-Oriented Architecture and Web ServicesFrench-language works237,207