High-Cloud Horizontal Inhomogeneity and Solar Albedo Bias
Bibliographic record
Abstract
High ice cloud horizontal inhomogeneity is examined using optical depth retrievals from four midlatitude datasets. Three datasets include ice cloud microphysical profiles derived from millimeter cloud radar at the Southern Great Plains Atmospheric Radiation Measurement site in Oklahoma. A fourth dataset combines lidar and midinfrared radiometry (LIRAD), and is from the Facility for Atmospheric Remote Sensing at the University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah. Plane-parallel homogeneous (PPH) calculations of domain-averaged solar albedo for these four datasets are compared to independent column approximation (ICA) results. A solar albedo bias up to 25% is found over a low reflective surface at a high solar zenith angle. A spherical solar albedo bias as high as 11% is shown. The gamma-weighted radiative transfer (GWRT) scheme is shown to be an effective correction for the solar albedo bias suitable for GCM applications. The GWRT result was, in all cases, within 1-2 W m 2 of the ICA outgoing solar flux. The GWRT requires a parameterization of the standard deviation of cloud optical depth. It is suggested that the domain-averaged cloud optical depth and ice water path together can be used in a parameterization to account for 80% of the standard deviation in optical depth.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".