Des collégiens et leurs maîtres au tournant du XXe siècle
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Par une approche inspirée de la micro-histoire, cette étude vise à analyser dans toute sa complexité la relation maître-élève dans un collège masculin du tournant du XXe siècle. L’analyse des lettres et des journaux intimes qu’ont laissés enseignants et enseignés met en lumière l’importance des dispositifs de contrôle de la jeunesse. Au collège, l’action éducative se déploie selon une conception hiérarchisée de l’école et de la société et s’appuie sur un rapport de pouvoir qui autorise l’usage d’une certaine violence. En dépit de la rigidité des règlements, le quotidien des collèges ménage une place aux liens affectifs entre maîtres et élèves. Les effets de telles amitiés sont cependant contradictoires : elles brisent la monotonie de l’univers collégien et lui donnent un peu de chaleur, mais elles engendrent aussi une pression accrue sur l’élève pour qu’il adhère aux valeurs du clergé enseignant et qu’il réponde à l’objectif de l’Église d’assurer le recrutement sacerdotal.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.008 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.028 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".